Multicenter Validation of Abbreviated MRI for Detecting Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Background Abbreviated MRI is a proposed paradigm shift for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance, but data on its performance are lacking for histopathologically confirmed early-stage HCC. Purpose To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of dynamic contrast-enhanced abbreviated MRI for early-stage HCC detection, using surgical pathologic findings as the reference standard. Materials and Methods This retrospective study was conducted at three U.S. liver transplant centers in patients with cirrhosis who underwent liver resection or transplant between January 2009 and December 2019 and standard "full" liver MRI with and without contrast enhancement within 3 months before surgery. Patients who had HCC-directed treatment before surgery were excluded. Dynamic abbreviated MRI examinations were simulated from the presurgical full MRI by selecting the coronal T2-weighted and axial three-dimensional fat-suppressed T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced sequences at precontrast, late arterial, portal venous, and delayed phases. Two abdominal radiologists at each center independently interpreted the simulated abbreviated examinations with use of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2018. Patients with any high-risk liver observations (>LR-3) were classified as positive; otherwise, they were classified as negative. With liver pathologic findings as the reference standard for the presence versus absence of early-stage HCC, the sensitivity, specificity, and their 95% CIs were calculated. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with correct classification. Results A total of 161 patients with early-stage HCC (median age, 62 years [IQR, 58-67 years]; 123 men) and 138 patients without HCC (median age, 55 years [IQR, 47-63 years]; 85 men) were confirmed with surgical pathologic findings. The sensitivity and specificity of abbreviated MRI were 88.2% (142 of 161 patients) (95% CI: 83.5, 92.5) and 89.1% (123 of 138 patients) (95% CI: 84.4, 93.8), respectively. Sensitivity was lower for Child-Pugh class B or C versus Child-Pugh class A cirrhosis (64.1% vs 94.2%; P < .001). Conclusion With surgical pathologic findings as the reference standard, dynamic abbreviated MRI had high sensitivity and specificity for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma detection in patients with compensated cirrhosis but lower sensitivity in those with decompensated cirrhosis. © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Kim in this issue.

Barriers to Surveillance for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in a Multicenter Cohort.

Importance: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance is underused in clinical practice, which may be owing to patient and clinician barriers. Objective: To characterize HCC surveillance barriers and associations with clinical outcomes in a multicenter cohort of patients with cirrhosis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective, multicenter cohort study included 5 medical centers in the United States. Patients with cirrhosis and newly diagnosed HCC treated from 2014 to 2018 were included. Data were analyzed from June 2021 to February 2022. Exposure: Surveillance completion in the 36-month period prior to HCC diagnosis. Main Outcomes and Measures: Surveillance receipt was classified as semiannual, annual, or no surveillance. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with semiannual surveillance. We conducted multivariable logistic and Cox regression analyses to characterize associations between surveillance completion with curative treatment and overall survival. Results: A total 629 eligible patients (median [IQR] age, 63.6 [56.2-71.0] years; 491 [78.1%] men) were assessed, including 7 American Indian or Alaska Native patients (1.1%), 14 Asian patients (2.2), 176 Black patients (28.0%), 86 Hispanic patients (13.1%), and 340 White patients (54.1%). Nearly two-thirds of the cohort had no surveillance prior to HCC diagnosis (mean [range by site] 63.7% [37.9%-80.4%]), with a mean (range by site) of 14.0% (5.3%-33.3%) of patients having received semiannual surveillance and 22.3% (14.3%-28.8%) of patients having received annual surveillance. The most common reasons for no surveillance were lack of surveillance orders or nonadherence (mean [range by site], 82.4% [66.7%-92.4%], although a mean (range by site) of 17.6% (10.2%-22.1%) of patients had unrecognized cirrhosis at HCC presentation. Semiannual surveillance was associated with hepatitis B infection (odds ratio [OR], 3.06 [95% CI, 1.24-7.23]) and inversely associated with Black race (OR, 0.41 [95% CI, 0.20-0.80]) and lack of cirrhosis recognition (OR, 0.14 [95% CI, 0.02-0.46]). Semiannual HCC surveillance was significantly associated with curative treatment receipt (OR, 2.73 [95% CI, 1.60-4.70]) but not overall survival (HR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.55-1.18]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of patients with cirrhosis, HCC surveillance was underused in more than 80% of patients and associated with failures across the screening process. Dedicated programs to improve cirrhosis detection and HCC surveillance attainment are needed.

Outcome of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Detected During Surveillance: Comparing USA and Japan.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Differences in outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) between countries have been largely attributed to variation in the conduct of surveillance and subsequent HCC treatment eligibility. However, differences in outcomes among those detected under surveillance have not been well described. We compared characteristics and prognosis between patients with surveillance-detected HCC from the United States (US) and Japan. METHODS: Patients in whom initial HCC was detected under surveillance between January 2006 and December 2015 from two centers in the US and two from Japan were included. Survival was compared between patients from the US and Japan using multivariable Cox regression analysis and propensity-score matched analysis. We performed subgroup analyses by liver disease etiology, tumor stage, and type of HCC treatment. RESULTS: Of 3788 HCC patients, 1797 (47.4%) were diagnosed under surveillance, 715 from the US and 1082 from Japan. Patients from the US diagnosed under surveillance had worse liver dysfunction and larger tumor burden than those from Japan. In multivariate analysis, US patients with surveillance-detected HCC had significantly worse survival than those from Japan (HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.00-1.35), which was also observed in propensity-score matched analysis. However, this difference was no longer significant after adjusting for treatment type (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.92-1.25). When stratified by treatment type, survival was comparable between the two countries except lower survival among patients who underwent resection in the US versus Japan. CONCLUSIONS: Prognosis of patients with surveillance-detected HCC is poorer in the US than Japan, primarily driven by differences in treatment delivery. Studies are necessary to elucidate reasons for these differences.